|
1
|
- A UNIVERSAL NOMENCLATURE SYSTEM FOR THE PIPELINE INDUSTRY
|
|
2
|
- Uniquely describe these 4 stars.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Describe the fundamental characteristics:
- Symmetry
- Color:
- Number of Points:
- Four Points
- Five Points
- Twelve Points
- Fourteen Points
|
|
5
|
- Symmetrical VS Asymmetrical
- Color
- Number of Points
|
|
6
|
- Symmetry:
- Symmetrical = 1,000
- Asymmetrical = 2,000
- Color:
- Red = 100
- Blue = 200
- Yellow = 300
- Green = 400
- Number of Points:
|
|
7
|
- Symmetry:
- Symmetrical = 1,000
- Asymmetrical = 2,000
- Color:
- Red = 100
- Blue = 200
- Yellow = 300
- Green = 400
- Number of Points:
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- How would you classify this common pipeline anomaly?
- Using Pipeline Alias, this anomaly can be uniquely classified as 1105.
|
|
10
|
- An indexed Classification System for Pipeline Anomalies and Features.
- ALIAS was inspired by an emerging need in our hi-technology industry
where terabytes of digital pipeline integrity data is accumulating.
- Problems:
- Correlation of data.
- Quality control.
- Ability to query databases.
- Regulator audit requirements.
|
|
11
|
- Published Sources included:
- API's "5T1 - Imperfection Terminology"
- ASME B31.4 Liquids
- ASME B31.8 Gas
- CSA's Z662
- Pig Source's Glossary of Pipeline Terms,
- The Pipeline Information Data Dictionary
- various NACE resources
- PODS
- C.E.P.A.’s recommended practices
- pipeline operators and other pipeline consultants
|
|
12
|
- From the HM Integrity Database
- 20 different pipeline operators
- 76 different pipeline sections from 3” to 30”
- 11 different ILI vendor's data
- 5 different ILI technologies
- 20,000 miles of pipeline ILI surveys
- 6,500 previous dig evaluations and repairs
- From the RTD Anomaly Evaluation database (PRISM)
- 11,000 excavations
- 24,000 anomaly evaluations
- 30 different pipeline operators
- 5 different pipeline codes and recommended practices
- 5 different NDE technologies
- 5 different ILI technologies
|
|
13
|
- Over 200 different items.
- The same item repeated with as many as six different terms!
- Required that specific definitions be used to identify which were unique
items.
- Went back to the list of sources to find definitions.
|
|
14
|
- Features and fittings:
- Function – Valves, Check Valves, Sleeves, etc.
- Anomalies
- Method of Degradation:
- mill, third party, corrosion, etc.
- Physical Attributes:
- 2D VS 3D – crack VS wall loss,
etc.
- Pipeline component affected:
- pipe wall, pipe shape, coating, etc.
|
|
15
|
- Features and Fittings group:
- “Any engineered appurtenance, repair or modification made to or on a
pipeline.”
- Anomalies group:
- “Abnormalities or defects on, or impacting the pipeline or its
immediate environment.”
|
|
16
|
- Classification - general or fundamental characteristic or function.
- Category – specific function, characteristics or degradation mode /
cause.
- Type – specific feature or anomaly.
|
|
17
|
- Volumetric - Anomalies that alter the cross sectional area of the pipe
wall.
- Planar - 2D Anomalies that do not change the cross sectional area of the
pipe wall.
- Geometric - Anomalies that change the general shape of the pipe.
- Geotechnical - Anomalies affecting the environment surrounding buried
pipelines.
- Cathodic Protection - Anomalies that alter the expected Cathodic
Protection on a pipeline.
- Coating - Anomalies in the coating on a pipeline.
- Weld Imperfections- Anomalies associated with a welding process.
- Others - Anomalies or occurrences other than previously listed.
- Features & Fittings - Mechanical appurtenances on the pipeline.
|
|
18
|
- Divisions are identified by specific characteristics or degradation mode
/ cause.
- An example using Volumetric anomalies is:
- Construction
- Corrosion
- Mill-related
- Mechanical
|
|
19
|
- Indexes individual anomalies by physical attributes and inspection
technique tolerances.
- Under the Corrosion Category there are four unique anomalies identified:
- Type:
- Corrosion Wall Loss – generic unknown method.
- General wall loss
- Isolated wall loss
- Erosion Corrosion
|
|
20
|
- Indexing of
- “Classifications” by thousands,
- “Categories” by hundreds,
- “Types” by ones and tens.
- 1000 = Volumetric
- 1100 = Corrosion Wall Loss
- 1105 = General Wall Loss
|
|
21
|
- No requirement to accept one term – multiple terms for the same item can
all refer to the same index:
- Classification “Volumetric”
- Category “Corrosion”
- Type “General Wall Loss” = 1105
- Other Terms:
- Cluster
- Group
- Box
- Associated Area
|
|
22
|
- No dimensional parameters
- Bigger anomalies have the same name as smaller versions of them selves.
- No Position Parameters
- A dent on the top of the pipe has the same index and name as a dent on
the bottom.
- No Cumulative Anomalies
- Stacking the entire library would result in thousands of new variations
– dent with crack, dent with crack and wall loss, etc.
- Each unique anomaly needs a separate index.
|
|
23
|
- As with any rule, convention, or guideline, there are exceptions that
don’t fit within the system:
- For ALIAS – we created the “Others” category.
- e.g. “External metal near the pipe”
|
|
24
|
- Applied to the HM Integrity Database
- 20 different pipeline operators
- 76 different pipeline sections from 3” to 30”
- 11 different ILI vendor's data
- 5 different ILI technologies
- 20,000 miles of pipeline ILI surveys
- 6,500 previous dig evaluations and repairs
- Applied to the RTD Anomaly Evaluation database (PRISM)
- 11,000 excavations
- 24,000 anomaly evaluations
- 30 different pipeline operators
- 5 different pipeline codes and recommended practices
- 5 different NDE technologies
- 5 different ILI technologies
|
|
25
|
- The index system of ALIAS not only identifies anomalies and features by
their fundamental characteristics, but it is also provides a
progressively concise correlation system.
- This is possible through the progressive indexing of definitions:
- Volumetric Anomaly
- Classification 1000 = anomaly that alters wall thickness
- Category 1100 = Corrosion wall loss
- Type 1110 = Isolated Pit
|
|
26
|
- Inspection technologies have specific abilities and limitations to make
specific call outs when identifying pipeline anomalies.
- A low or standard resolution MFL ILI tool can only classify anomalies as
having the appearance of wall loss.
- Even though likely due to corrosion, a wall loss anomaly would be assigned the index:
- 1000 = "Volumetric
Defect".
- No Category or Type assigned due to tool limitation.
|
|
27
|
- Excavation and NDE with Ultrasonics could then determine that the
anomaly was a single isolated internal wall loss pit, and it would be
classified as:
- 1110, "Isolated Wall loss".
- A Type is assigned based on the NDE tools.
- If the section of pipe containing the anomaly was then cut out and
sectioned for further examination, the source of the wall loss could be
further determined to be assigned index:
- 1210 = "Mill Slug Void".
- A very concise and accurate Type is assigned.
|
|
28
|
- All three call outs were all in the same Classification (1000
Volumetric):
- ILI = 1000 - "Volumetric
Defect".
- NDE = 1110 - "Isolated Wall loss".
- Lab = 1210 - "Mill Slug Void".
- A correlation of the call outs from all three methods of inspection can
be easily made, confirming accuracy within the tolerance of each method.
|
|
29
|
- Accessible on the web using Active Server Pages (ASP) with the data
itself being housed in Microsoft SQL Server.
- Anyone can access and use the database from their web browser on any
web-enabled computer.
- Users can create user accounts and store their preferred terms for each
index.
- Customized lists can be downloaded and printed from the web site.
- The web site and database development was funded by Amec Pipeline
Professionals and, It’s free!
|
|
30
|
- Should have a committee or association with industry representation to
direct alterations, changes and additions to the library and to the
function of the database and web site.
- Should translate the library and definitions to other languages.
- Should remain free, and accessible to all interested parties.
|
|
31
|
|